65 MPG Ford the U.S. can't have
- added September 22, 2008
- 6 responses
-
-
-
- shadowtrekker
- added this
-
The ECOnetic will go on sale in Europe in November.
Ford's 2009 Fiesta ECOnetic goes on sale in November. But here's the catch: Despite the car's potential to transform Ford's image and help it compete with Toyota Motor and Honda Motor in its home market, the company will sell the little fuel sipper only in Europe. "We know it's an awesome vehicle," says Ford America President Mark Fields. "But there are business reasons why we can't sell it in the U.S." The main one: The Fiesta ECOnetic runs on diesel.
Automakers such as Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz have predicted for years that a technology called "clean diesel" would overcome many Americans' antipathy to a fuel still often thought of as the smelly stuff that powers tractor trailers. Diesel vehicles now hitting the market with pollution-fighting technology are as clean or cleaner than gasoline and at least 30% more fuel-efficient.
Yet while half of all cars sold in Europe last year ran on diesel, the U.S. market remains relatively unfriendly to the fuel. Taxes aimed at commercial trucks mean diesel costs anywhere from 40 cents to $1 more per gallon than gasoline. Add to this the success of the Toyota Prius, and you can see why only 3% of cars in the U.S. use diesel. "Americans see hybrids as the darling," says Global Insight auto analyst Philip Gott, "and diesel as old-tech."
None of this is stopping European and Japanese automakers, which are betting they can jump-start the U.S. market with new diesel models. Mercedes-Benz by next year will have three cars it markets as "BlueTec." Even Nissan and Honda, which long opposed building diesel cars in Europe, plan to introduce them in the U.S. in 2010. But Ford, whose Fiesta ECOnetic compares favorably with European diesels, can't make a business case for bringing the car to the U.S.
Too Pricey to Import
First of all, the engines are built in Britain, so labor costs are high. Plus the pound remains stronger than the greenback. At prevailing exchange rates, the Fiesta ECOnetic would sell for about $25,700 in the U.S. By contrast, the Prius typically goes for about $24,000. A $1,300 tax deduction available to buyers of new diesel cars could bring the price of the Fiesta to around $24,400. But Ford doesn't believe it could charge enough to make money on an imported ECOnetic.
Ford plans to make a gas-powered version of the Fiesta in Mexico for the U.S. So why not manufacture diesel engines there, too? Building a plant would cost at least $350 million at a time when Ford has been burning through more than $1 billion a month in cash reserves. Besides, the automaker would have to produce at least 350,000 engines a year to make such a venture profitable. "We just don't think North and South America would buy that many diesel cars," says Fields.
The question, of course, is whether the U.S. ever will embrace diesel fuel and allow automakers to achieve sufficient scale to make money on such vehicles. California certified VW and Mercedes diesel cars earlier this year, after a four-year ban. James N. Hall, of auto researcher 293 Analysts, says that bellwether state and the Northeast remain "hostile to diesel." But the risk to Ford is that the fuel takes off, and the carmaker finds itself playing catch-up—despite having a serious diesel contender in its arsenal.
-
-
- shadowtrekker
- 1 month ago
-
this could run on biodiesel as well, would be great for home brew since the car would go through such little fuel.
-
-
- shadowtrekker
- 1 month ago
-
-
i believe you CAN edit the title to make it mpg instead of mph....
next, the prius can get 45 mpg without trying hard and you can shove EIGHT-FOOT 2x4's into it by dropping the back and passenger seats.
i really doubt this fordlet can do that, so for me it wouldn't be worth the extra 20 mpg, which might change the fuel cost per mile from six or seven cents per mile to eight or nine...
and the prius has four doors, too, and about 750-850 pounds of hauling capacity [beyond the driver.]
-
@kcfoxie, a lot of that is a matter of taste, and when a car today gets 47 mpg [mine went up from 44 when i put some more air in the tires... :)))))], when you go from 47 to 50 or 65 mpg, the cost of fuel PER MILE drops by one or two cents. unless you're going 100k miles a year, it's still hard to justify.
my prius turns 55 on flat 45mph driving, 47 in ALL-AROUND driving, flat like Silicon Valley or hilly like Raleigh, NC. It's pulled a trailer 15k miles 'cross country five times without a whimper, and while it doesn't have a leather-wrapped steering wheel like my wife's '98 Camry, it DOES have full leather on ALL of the seats and liners. and can your dad's golf carry six 6-foot 80-pound cabinet boxes home from Lowes ALONG WITH a dozen or so 8' 2x4's?
people choose cars for reasons of taste, preference, economic limitations, driving comfort and security needs, luxury and probably ten other reasons.
you, your dad and I are ALL "correct" in our choices.
i knew people who didn't buy VW's because they associated them with Germany and WWII. i loved chevrolets until the quality went down the tubes [gee, was it ever THAT high???] and bought my first Ford in '77, even though i knew people who wouldn't buy ANY ford EVER because Henry was anti-semitic.....
then i discovered that while the Taurus was nice on the outside, it had some really crappy design flaws inside. i traded the taurus and a corvette for money to buy my prius in '04, and its run like a clock ever since i bought it.
handles very nicely, too, thanks...
enjoy your choice. i enjoy mine [even though it looks strange compared to so many other designs... :)))) ]
