Art or porn? No. 3

Artporn.

looks like an insane war-on-drugs campaign designed to keep your attention on the message by filling the background with naked bodies.

p70n, but you censored the naughty parts.

A lot of the art that is now considered treasured art from our past, re: naked lady paintings, was simply 'high society pornography.' Because it was done with skill and talent, it passed as 'culture.' I'm not saying this is a good or bad thing, it just is.

Everybody has a different point of view. But what can we say about that.

Nude art has always been a main stream in many high officials around the world.

And nude art can be seen everywhere specially domai.com is a good example of it.

Art for mature adults, porn for frat guys.

art

Good god. What a tight wad society we've become to say that all nudity is pornographic in nature.

Half art and half sex.

For the sake of avoiding censorship, I'll go with art. :)

i see no porn

It's neither. It just isn't interesting enough to fall into either category, let alone both.

It looks like somebody has a lot of time.

I'm confused... Neither? Looks like some sort of odd ad that doesn't really work superimposed over some barely-distinguishable naked bodies.

It's an attempt at art. It's not really pornographic, considering there is truly no discernible sexual act going on.

Neither.

I think the question is more interesting than the subject matter.