Shockome Syndrome
- added October 06, 2008
- 7 responses
-
-
-
- regjoeschmo
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- Politics (34091)
- WTF (14596)
- Law (1424)
- Children (1395)
- Activism (989)
- Corruption (673)
- Civil Rights (589)
- Parental Rights (156)
- Domestic Violence (138)
- Civil Disobediance (30)
The National Organization for Women attacked divorced dads in a resolution at its national conference in July. This spring several branches of NOW, including New York and Michigan, issued Action Alerts against moderate legislative attempts to help dads remain a part of their children's lives after divorce or separation.
One of the fatherhood movement's primary goals is to get family courts and family law to properly address the issue of parental alienation. Parental alienation occurs when one parent, usually the custodial parent, has turned his or her children against the other parent, destroying the loving bonds the children and the target parent once enjoyed.
The fatherhood movement has had some modest success in creating awareness of parental alienation, both in the courtroom and in the media. Now the FFLM is hitting back hard. NOW's July resolution denounced Parental Alienation Syndrome as a "defense strategy for batterers and sexual predators that purports to explain a child's estrangement from one parent, or explains away allegations against the estranged parent of abuse/sex abuse of child, by blaming the protective parent." According to NOW, the employment of this "unethical, unconstitutional, and dangerous" tactic is so common as to constitute "epidemic levels of abuse and dysfunction in our court system."
California NOW's report attacks the fatherhood movement and relentlessly assails PAS. CANOW Executive Director Helen Grieco calls PAS a "scam," and says, "As activists we must continue to expose the true agenda of the Fathers' Rights movement. We must eradicate the gender bias...that is rampant in our family courts." The annual Battered Mothers Custody Conference, which will be held January 12-14 in Albany, New York, espouses similar views.
Newsweek magazine, in a recent article called "Fighting Over the Kids: Why Parents Who Batter Win Custody," claims that "many parents nationwide…have lost custody due to a controversial concept known as parental alienation…Parental alienation is now the leading defense for parents accused of abuse in custody cases, according to domestic-violence advocates. And it's working."
Parental alienation was the leading topic at a recent Dallas, Texas domestic violence conference sponsored by the Dallas County District Attorney and numerous domestic violence groups. The Dallas Morning News reports that parental alienation is "an increasingly common defense in child-custody battles [which] is raising concerns among those who work with victims of domestic violence…Advocates of domestic violence victims say a growing number of batterers are using the tactic in court to gain custody of their children." Recent lopsided articles in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the Contra Costa Times, the Providence Journal and many others have expressed similar sentiments.
Last October PBS aired Breaking the Silence: Children's Stories on affiliates across the country. The film pointed to an alleged epidemic of loving, protective mothers losing custody of their children to abusive, molesting fathers after the fathers claimed parental alienation.
MORE IN LiNK
-
-
- regjoeschmo
- 1 month ago
-
PAS is REAL. NOW must be exposed for their irrational, abhorant bias against men!
According to this article "NOW's Membership and Budget Are Grossly Overinflated"
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_20_17/ai_75122070
More and more women are denouncing NOW for trying to destroy our children's lives by denying them the right to two fit, loving parents..
-
As a woman I can say that parental alienation does exist. More woman are coming forward and the feminist should have a concern as for many women like myself no longer share their opinions. Welcome to my GENERATION Ladies. Equality has been instilled in my values and one sex shall not dominate the other.
-
Fatherhood "movement" VS Feminist "movement" !?!?!?!?
You're fucking kidding me right?
There are WARS going on, people are dying because they don't have food or water!
This is insanity.
-
37.9% of fathers have no access/visitation rights.
(Source: 6,col. II, para. 6, lines 4 & 5, Census Bureau P-60, 173, Sept 1991.)
"40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the
non-custodial father's visitation on at least one occasion, to punish
the ex-spouse." (Source: p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing Fulton)
Frequency of visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in Reports by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of Orthopsychiatry, 1991.)"Overall, approximately 50% of mothers "see no value in the father's
continued contact with his children...." (Source: Surviving the Breakup,
Joan Kelly & Judith Wallerstein, p.125)Only 11% of mothers value their husband's input when it comes to handling problems with their kids.
Teachers & doctors rated 45%, and close friends & relatives rated %16.(Source: EDK Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine. Redbook, November 1994, p.36)
"The former spouse (mother) was the greatest obstacle to having more
frequent contact with the children." (Source: Increasing our understanding of fathers who have infrequent contact with their children, James Dudley, Family
Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July 1991.)"A clear majority (70%) of fathers felt that they have/had too little time with
their children." (Source: Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann
Kock & Carol Lowery, Journal of Divorce, Vol. 8, No. 2, p.54, Winter 1984)"Very few of the children were satisfied with the amount of contact
with their fathers, after divorce." (Source: Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch & Lowery, Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p.50, Winter 1984.).."Feelings of anger towards their former spouses hindered effective involvement on the part of fathers; angry mothers would sometimes sabotage father's efforts to visit their children." (Source: Ahrons and Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442, July 1993.)
"Mothers may prevent visits to retaliate against fathers for problems in their
marital or post-marital relationship." (Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer & Charing,Journal of Marriage & the Family, Vol. 51, p. 1015, November 1989.)In a study: "Visitational Interference - A National Study" by Ms. Jannette Vanini, M.S.W. and Edward Nichols, M.S.W., it was found that 77% ofnon-custodial fathers are NOT able to "visit" their children, as ordered by the
court, as a result of "visitation interference" perpetuated by the
custodial parent.In other words, non-compliance with court ordered visitation
is three times the problem of non-compliance with court ordered child support and impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally published Sept.1992-
-
- regjoeschmo
- 1 month ago
-
