'Bailout the hungry,' activists tell World Bank
- added October 11, 2008
- 7 responses
-
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
-
-
- related topics
-
- News and Politics (44767)
- Earth and Science (13157)
- Environment (6160)
- Food (1959)
- Poverty (606)
- Sustainability (345)
- Farming (181)
- Hunger (141)
- Global Water Crisis (117)
- World Bank (59)
- Global Food Crisis (30)
Any conference regarding food or any crisis surrounding it must also include discussion of the global water crisis. You cannot grow food without water, and in many areas of the developing world especially in Asia and Africa water is a resource that is becoming harder and harder to come by due to mismanagement, waste, pollution, climate change, privitization, and population increases.There is also too much power concentrated with organizations like the World Bank and the corporations they are in collusion with. When you have a central bank controlling everything, it appears more people have nothing.
This food crisis could be addressed much more effectively if there was more regulation regarding loaning these countries money in regards to the rates they are charged on top of the loan along with other stipulations that make their contracts hard to fulfill ( such as agreeing to loan money to lay water pipes on the stipulation that their water will be privitized.) How about forgiving all third world debt for a start? That in and of itself would free up funds that could then be used for sustainable development (solar and wind etc.) in these countries and allow people to gain access to small loans such as those provided by the Grameen Bank to start people in their own businesses. Making their own income not accountable to some World Bank that seeks to run their lives and tell them they must plant genetically modified foods to make their benefactors like Monsanto more profit would also ease much poverty in these areas and start people on the road not only to sustainability but life. Isn't that freedom?
I don't claim to be an expert on any of this nor to have the answers. I do know however, that the food and water crises we now find ourselves in the midst of is the most important thing in concert with the climate crisis that all ties in together that we now face in this century, and we need new answers as the old ways do not appear to be working any longer. It is simply unconscienable to me that with the billions upon billions of dollars we have in this world to spend on bailing out greedy bankers, wage illegal wars, and continue to support corrupted systems that actually perpetuate these crises, that we can't find some of those funds along with some compassion and political will to for once do the right thing. No child in any country should have to die because some pencil pusher in a government organization or a world leader a world away is holding back the food that child needs because of political or economic expedience.
Feed the people, and give them water. There is more than enough. What we need to do now is find that moral and political strength to do it and do it equitably. It shouldn't be hard if you have a heart and a conscience.
OK, getting down off my soap box now. ;-)
-
-
- JanforGore
- 1 month ago
-
From the article:
'As developed economies scramble to stabilize their financial markets through more vigorous regulation, the international anti-poverty agency ActionAid is urging leaders at a World Bank summit in Washington on Oct. 11-13 to take action to save the lives of people who are dying because of the world food crisis, which has catapulted another 100 million people into the ranks of the hungry. Nearly one billion people - a sixth of the world's population - now face devastating hunger. Shefali Sharma, Head of ActionAid's Food Crisis Taskforce, said:"We are witnessing an unprecedented effort to bail out the global financial industry and an acknowledgement that for too long, lack of government involvement and oversight has led to massive failures in the market. A similar rethinking needs to take place on the food crisis. At least $30 billion a year is needed now to invigorate environmentally friendly small scale food production in developing countries and to ensure that the poor and vulnerable are spared the brunt of the fuel and food crisis. But for this investment to be effective, we need a clear break from past Bank orthodoxy and prescriptions on agriculture and for the institution to support the Right to Food Framework enshrined at the UN."
The financial, fuel and food crises form the backdrop of the World Bank and IMF annual meetings. Over the weekend, governments and the Bank will discuss the three crises and potential responses. In its new report, Rising Food And Fuel Prices: Addressing the Risks To Future Generations which will be released on Oct. 12, the Bank acknowledges that "For those already struggling to meet their daily food and nutrient needs, the double shock of food and fuel price rises represents a threat to basic survival. The poorest households are reducing the quantity and/or quality of the food, schooling, and basic services that they consume, leading to irreparable damage to the health and education of millions of children." Women and girls will be the hardest hit, the report warns, because "gender disparities in the quantity and quality of food consumed increase during times of shortage," compelling mothers and daughters to "skip entire days of eating." Ironically, Women grow 60-80% of the world's food.
Having acknowledged the food crisis and the immediate need for social safety nets, the Bank continues to struggle with a bigger role for the State in resolving these crises even as it supports the financial bailout.
Commenting on the Bank's strategy ActionAid USA's Governance Policy Analyst, Rick Rowden said:
"Today when countries' social protection mechanisms are being stretched, the World Bank has noted that 'Many countries have inadequate safety nets and some are realizing that they have underinvested in these systems,' but countries are not just 'realizing' this now. In fact, such chronic underinvestment has long been a result of the loan conditions and policy advice of the Bank and the International Monetary Fund over many years to cut back on spending and public investment in order to achieve the IMF's overly-austere definition of 'macroeconomic stability.' Even now, as the IMF announced emergency lending to 15 countries, it has kept in place its unnecessarily restrictive fiscal and monetary policy targets that will continue to block countries from being able to increase public investment. These contradictions must be addressed."
-
-
- JanforGore
- 1 month ago
-
-
We need more organizations like Tree Nation. Tree Nation seeks to plant 8 million trees in the shape of a heart in Niger, the poorest country in the world. Through this endeavor these trees will stop desertification, replenish the soil, and provide a carbon offset as well as food and shelter for many people in this area. It is also the people who live there who are planting the trees and therefore learning sustainable practices at the same time. I have been a member of Tree Nation for over a year and a half now and support this endeavor wholeheartedly. This proves what can be done when people come together.
Also if anyone is interested, I have a petition there that is still open and Tree Nation is planting a tree in Niger for every 100 signatures. So far it has garnered 1325 signatures from all over the world. It is very hopeful to see so many people from all around the world pledging to do all they can to be climate messengers. That is where it starts.
-
-
- JanforGore
- 1 month ago
-
-
Jan, you're very right, as usual. I like it that you do your research before you open your mouth:)
There are organizations out there that do their best to train people in third world countries on how to farm, use water responsibly, how to set up community wells, build better sanitation, etc.
Unfortunately, wars, genocide and threats to all who try to help, is keeping the aid and the help away from those who need it most.
Instead of waging an illegal war in Iraq, the US should have taken the lead in helping to stop the genocide in Darfur and surrounding countries. That way aid and education could reach the areas that need it so desperately.
You have probably heard of http://www.kiva.org/ but I'll put it up here again. It is a way for each of us to do what little we can for others.
-
Kiva is a good organzation, and you are correct that there are many out here doing good things apart from the governments and their affiliated organizations like the World Bank and getting good results. And I agree with you as well that there are threats to those who help, and political upheaval and now the effects of climate change (such as what recently happened in Haiti with the storms) that are keeping aid from people who need it as well. But it is hopeful to know that there are organizations out here doing good for people and giving them tools and education to sustain themselves and not just throwing money at a problem that doesn't go away unless the money is put to good use. And two organizaitons that I respect in that vein are Water Partners International and also Heifer.org. So we can all have a stake in changing the future for the better and in helping to solve these crises by becoming more involved with the good organizations that put the wellbeing of those they teach and serve first.
-
-
- JanforGore
- 1 month ago
-
-
'At least $30 billion a year is needed now to invigorate environmentally friendly small scale food production in developing countries and to ensure that the poor and vulnerable are spared the brunt of the fuel and food crisis. But for this investment to be effective, we need a clear break from past Bank orthodoxy and prescriptions on agriculture and for the institution to support the Right to Food Framework enshrined at the UN." '
The right to food. Is food a human right? I think it is just as water is.
-
-
- JanforGore
- 1 month ago
-
-
STOP REMOVING MY TAGS.
-
-
- JanforGore
- 1 month ago
-
-
RIGHT ON.
