Elections // Current

Iraqi cabinet accepts US agreement

Sabah al-Nasseri: Strong nationalist movement has mobilized against the agreement, and they have guns. Part 3

The Iraqi cabinet agreed by a vote of 27-1 on Sunday to approve the newest US draft of the Status of Forces Agreement between the two countries. The agreement speaks to a variety of issues concerning the occupation, including the complete withdrawal from Iraq of US forces by the end of 2011. Moreover, it includes a promise from the US to not use Iraqi territory as a launch pad to attack inside other Middle-eastern countries, as it did in late October during a raid on a village inside Syria. Sabah al-Nasseri believes that the Iraqi parliament will eventually turn down the agreement for political reasons, in the interests of securing one with Barack Obama when he comes to power in January. The timing is important as the Iraqi provincial elections, which are extremely significant given the power granted provinces under the Iraqi constitution, will take place on January 31. Sabah believes that the importance of faring well in those elections will force the parliament to reject an agreement which has received the rebuke of numerous groups, both religious and secular, who have organized massive protests over recent weeks. One piece of the agreement that very few people are talking about, which Sabah believes has angered many nationalists of all stripes, is the labeling of any armed resistance against occupation forces as terrorists, thereby criminalizing their activities under Iraqi law. Sabah believes that the most recent violence in Iraq was carried out by secular nationalists who are opposed to the deal, given that the targets of the attacks were all US and Iraqi government elements. Sabah, who was born and raised in the Southern Iraqi city of Basra, reiterates his support for an immediate withdrawal of all foreign occupiers, believing that the violence in Iraq stems from the occupation.

Born in Basra, Iraq, Sabah al-Nasseri is Professor of Political Science (Middle East Politics) at York University, Toronto. Prior to that he was a Lecturer of Political Science at the J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt. Currently he is working on an article, “Understanding Iraq.”

See Part 1 at: http://current.com/items/89534152/un_mandate_for_us_troops_in_iraq_running_out.htm

See Part 2 at: http://current.com/items/89534210/be_careful_what_you_wish_for.htmSabah al-Nasseri: Strong nationalist movement has mobilized against the agreement, and they have guns. Part 3 The Iraqi cabinet... more

Vierotchka
added this

3 responses

1 hour ago

The End Of America: Movie

Its not over yet, as we speak the Bush administration is looting our treasury and our future.

uppityprogressive
added this

2 responses

1 hour ago

How Barack Obama Got Elected

See how media coverage of the 2008 election impacted what Obama voters knew (or thought they knew) about the campaign.

andreypod
added this

0 responses

9 hours ago

Barack Obama It Had To Be You Because We've Had Enough!

Yes, It had to be President Barack Obama, because we really have, had ENOUGH! --- We've been warned against offering the... more

thinkingblue
added this

0 responses

1 day ago

Impeach Bush To Stop Pardons

The Founding Fathers clearly anticipated a corrupt President might pardon his co-conspirators, and specified impeachment as the... more

uppityprogressive
added this

14 responses

1 day ago

Let's Ban No-Sex-Marriage!

So an interesting precedent has been set in what I once thought was a free country--the majority can take away the rights of the... more

PoisonTheMonkey
added this

10 responses

3 days ago

Voter Intelligence

In light of the recent election, I couldn't have said it better myself !! LOL!!

XlntJoyce
added this

14 responses

4 days ago

Far right crazy attacks on Obama

The "Impeach Obama" Facebook groups, for example. No, I'm not making that up. They're real and there's a... more

VynalFrontier
added this

0 responses

4 days ago

Political South Irrelevant!?

What may have ended on Election Day, though, is the centrality of the South to national politics. By voting so emphatically for... more

VynalFrontier
added this

0 responses

4 days ago

Important Question To Barack Obama

There is a web project called "bigdialog" which allows people to submit questions to the new president elect. After the... more

currenton
added this

0 responses

4 days ago

Noob Repubs finally figure out what the intertoobz do.

Abysmal election results encourage Republicans to surf the toobz and blog!

neocongo
added this

0 responses

5 days ago

Wall Street Journal Makes Rightward Veer With News Hire

Wall Street Journal has hired Gerard Baker, a self-styled "right-wing curmudgeon" from the Times Of London, as the... more

uppityprogressive
added this

2 responses

5 days ago

Nicaragua election clash 'deaths'

At least two people have been killed and six others injured in Nicaragua in post-election violence, according to unconfirmed... more

logicpocket
added this

2 responses

6 days ago

Barack Obama on Media Consolidation

From Freepress:

Now that the reality of an Obama presidency is sinking in, I want to give you a sense of what it means for the future of the media.

In a nutshell, if the new president lives up to his campaign promises, we are poised to see an unprecedented transformation of U.S. media.

Unlike George W. Bush, the president-elect is a strong supporter of Net Neutrality and universal, affordable Internet access. He is opposed to further consolidation of media ownership, and he is a friend to public broadcasting. Obama's election represents a sea change in leadership that allows us to go from playing defense to offense. These are exciting times.

While Free Press is a tax-deductible, nonpartisan organization that cannot and does not endorse political candidates, we are heartened by our nation’s new direction.

Obama's election rekindles hope that media reform may finally claim its rightful place in American politics as a bona fide political issue -- one whose success is essential to progress on every other issue: from health care to the environment; from financial reform to war and peace.

Free Press has worked tirelessly since our founding five years ago to stop the Bush White House from allowing runaway consolidation of media ownership, from slashing funding for public broadcasting, and from handing over control of the Internet to the largest phone and cable companies. Thanks to your unwavering support and activism, we have succeeded to an extent that few thought possible.

However, as the new president inherits a severe economic crisis, two wars, and myriad other problems, it will be too easy for media reform to get pushed down the to-do list (click here for a look at Obama's important media reform pledges during his campaign).

Our job -- your job -- is to keep our momentum going and make sure President Obama makes good on his campaign pledges in the face of competing priorities and well-financed lobbyists from the phone, cable and broadcasting companies.

* The future of our economy and our democracy requires that Congress and FCC pass policies that get fast, open, affordable Internet to every home and business in America, urban and rural, rich and poor.
* We must foster hard-hitting journalism that holds the powerful accountable and covers the issues that affect you most.
* There must be no more consolidation of media ownership, and we must create incentives for more independent, local radio, television and print media.
* We must double funding for public media -- for PBS as NPR, as well as for community media and other noncommercial outlets, and ensure that public media are protected from undue political influence.

Continued:From Freepress: Now that the reality of an Obama presidency is sinking in, I want to give you a sense of what it means for the... more