TV Schedule

Border Fence

  • Public Topic: Everyone is invited to contribute to Border Fence

    • Tribe says border fence restricts sacred rites

      Calling it an affront to religious freedom, representatives of an Arizona Indian tribe have asked the federal government to halt construction of a border fence across the tribe's Arizona reservation.

      Leaders of the Tohono O'odham nation say the fence, currently being built along the U.S.-Mexican border by the Department of Homeland Security, will prevent members of their nation from crossing into Mexico for traditional religious ceremonies.

      "This wall and the construction of this wall has destroyed our communities, our burial sites and ancient Tohono O'odham routes throughout our lands," said Ofelia Rivas, according to the Washington Times.

      Rivas argued that the fence will violate the 1978 American Indian Religious Freedom Act, which guarantees free exercise of traditional religious practices for Native Americans. She said that the fence would disrupt such practices by limiting travel to and from O'odham land in Mexico.

      The Tohono O'odham reservation straddles the Mexican border for 75 miles in Arizona, and extends south into Mexico. According to the 2000 census, 18,000 people live on the reservation, which spans an area roughly the size of Connecticut.

      Rivas' statement is the latest salvo from the Tohono O'odham nation protesting the fence. The community has been at odds with the federal government in recent years over how best to deal with undocumented immigrants and smugglers who cross through tribal lands.

      Testifying in front of a House subcommittee last April, the nation's chairman, Ned Norris Jr., called the Department of Homeland Security "inflexible" and "unreasonable," and framed the fence as part of a larger problem facing the nation.

      "Our land is now cut in half, with O'odham communities, sacred sites, salt pilgrimage routes, and families divided," Norris said. "We did not cross the 75 miles of border within our reservation lands. The border crossed us."
      Calling it an affront to religious freedom, representatives of an Arizona Indian tribe have asked the federal government to halt const... more

      goldenways

      added this

      5 responses

      8 days ago
    • Border fence will skirt environmental laws

      In an aggressive move to finish building 670 miles of border fence by the end of this year, the Department of Homeland Security announced today that it will waive federal environmental laws to meet that goal.

      The two waivers, which will allow the department to slash through a thicket of environmental and cultural laws, would be the most expansive to date, encompassing land in California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas that stretches about 470 miles.

      The waivers are highly controversial with environmentalists and border communities, which see them as a federal imposition that could damage the land and disrupts wildlife.
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Fences solve nothing and this waste of effort is at the expense of a diverse ecosystem. How this is not seen an unconstitutional baffles me.
      In an aggressive move to finish building 670 miles of border fence by the end of this year, the Department of Homeland Security announ... more

      JanforGore

      added this

      0 responses

      13 days ago
    • Border Fence Challenge Rebuffed

      The government's plan to build a 670-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border took another step forward Monday when the Supreme Court turned away a legal challenge from environmentalists.

      The court's action clears the way for U.S. officials to press ahead with the project with little worry that judges will be able to stop it.

      Three years ago, Congress gave Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff an unusual power to "waive all legal requirements" that could stand in the way of building the fence. These requirements included the nation's environmental protection laws. The same congressional action took away the authority of judges to review Chertoff's decisions.

      Last year, after Chertoff waived at least 20 laws and regulations to complete a section of the fence in Arizona, two environmental groups sued. They said it was unconstitutional to give a Cabinet secretary such sweeping power.

      But a federal judge rejected that claim. And on Monday the Supreme Court without comment declined to hear a petition submitted by Defenders of Wildlife and the Sierra Club.

      The high court's refusal is not a ruling, and it doesn't mean the justices won't reconsider the issue. But for now, Chertoff and his department have the go-ahead to proceed with the fence. Nearly half the barrier has been built.

      Oliver Bernstein, a spokesman for the Sierra Club in Austin, Texas, called the court's action "unfortunate."

      "This decision leaves one man -- the secretary of the Homeland Security -- with the extraordinary power to ignore any and all of the laws designed to protect the American people, our lands and our natural resources," Bernstein said. "Today's decision will allow the DHS to continue to waive key health, environmental and safety laws that have protected communities, wildlife, archaeological, historic and cultural resources."

      Fourteen House Democrats and a group of law professors had urged the Supreme Court to take the case. They agreed with the environmentalists that it was unprecedented to give a Cabinet member so much power while also stripping judges of the authority to review the legality of his actions.

      Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), a proponent of the law, called the court's action "a victory for the American people" and a milestone toward finishing the barrier.

      "According to recent estimates, nearly half a million illegal immigrants cross the border annually," Smith said. "The court's refusal to hear the case . . . ensures that the DHS can carry out Congress' mandate to build a fence along the U.S.-Mexico border without legal restrictions or interference from environmentalists."

      The project still faces legal challenges from landowners and tribal groups. It is unclear whether judges have the authority to act on such claims.
      The government's plan to build a 670-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border took another step forward Monday when the Supreme Co... more

      anglcazn

      added this

      0 responses

      20 days ago
    • This is not a pipe dream

      Subcomandante Marcos comes to the United States with the plans for a trickle-up democratic reform to empower the downtrodden.

      waynesumstine

      added this

      11 responses

      1 day ago
    • US and Canada agree to use each other's troops in 'civil emergencies...

      Canada and the U.S. have signed an agreement that paves the way for the militaries from either nation to send troops across each other's borders during an emergency, but some are questioning why the Harper government has kept silent on the deal.

      Neither the Canadian government nor the Canadian Forces announced the new agreement, which was signed Feb. 14 in Texas.

      The U.S. military's Northern Command, however, publicized the agreement with a statement outlining how its top officer, Gen. Gene Renuart, and Canadian Lt.-Gen. Marc Dumais, head of Canada Command, signed the plan, which allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a civil emergency.

      The new agreement has been greeted with suspicion by the left wing in Canada and the right wing in the U.S.

      The left-leaning Council of Canadians, which is campaigning against what it calls the increasing integration of the U.S. and Canadian militaries, is raising concerns about the deal.

      "It's kind of a trend when it comes to issues of Canada-U.S. relations and contentious issues like military integration. We see that this government is reluctant to disclose information to Canadians that is readily available on American and Mexican websites," said Stuart Trew, a researcher with the Council of Canadians.

      Trew said there is potential for the agreement to militarize civilian responses to emergency incidents. He noted that work is also underway for the two nations to put in place a joint plan to protect common infrastructure such as roadways and oil pipelines.
      ~~~~~~~~
      Something else not in our MSM that people should know about. I once did not believe that plans for a North American Union were real. I believe it now. This also explains to me the border fence in Texas and using immigration as a smoke screen for their real agenda.
      Canada and the U.S. have signed an agreement that paves the way for the militaries from either nation to send troops across each other... more

      JanforGore

      added this

      2 responses

      12 days ago
    • Texas officials sue US over border fence

      Texas mayors and business leaders filed a class-action lawsuit Friday alleging Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff hoodwinked landowners into waiving their property hts for construction of a fence along the Mexican border.

      Members of the Texas Border Coalition said Chertoff did not fairly negotiate compensation with landowners for access to their land for six-month surveys to choose fence sites. The coalition of mayors and business and community leaders is seeking an injunction to block work on the fence.

      They also want a federal judge to rescind all the agreements with landowners and to order Chertoff to start again. The department has sought and won access from hundreds of landowners to determine where to build the fence and other barriers to illegal border crossings.

      The coalition's attorney, Peter Schey, said Chertoff violated a 1996 immigration law that requires fair negotiation with landowners.

      The lawsuit also names Robert Janson, director of Asset Management at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, as a defendant.

      It was filed with U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton, a Bush nominee who presided in the criminal case of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff.

      "They hoodwinked property owners" into waiving their property rights, Schey said.

      "This whole thing has been built on a foundation of lawlessness," he said.

      Landowners were visited by officials from Homeland Security, Army Corps of Engineers and Customs and Border Patrol. But the government didn't send anyone to advise the owners' of their property rights, Schey said. Some landowners accepted offers of $100 for access to their land.


      ~~~~~~~
      Of course it has been built on lawlessness... this is the Bush regime we're talking about. Tell me why these people are in power again? And this fence is a farce and will do nothing but waste time and money better spent. Just another scheme to not only keep people out, but to keep people in and ruin the environment. Good for Texas for standing up to Nosferatu.
      Texas mayors and business leaders filed a class-action lawsuit Friday alleging Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff hoodwinked... more

      JanforGore

      added this

      25 responses

      22 days ago
    • Wire found between 2 border fences

      The wire was strung between two sections of fence separating California from Mexico, and was placed at just the right height so that when pulled taut, it could decapitate anyone who happened to be riding an ATV...like the ones border patrol agents ride around on. Yikes!!! I know that border agents get a bad rap a lot of the time - they're the ones who "bust the poor immigrants risking their lives coming to the US to make a better life for their families back home" (using all the cliche lines here)...but stringing up a wire to decapitate them?! That's pretty harsh, no? The wire was strung between two sections of fence separating California from Mexico, and was placed at just the right height so that w... more

      Tori

      added this

      6 responses

      8 hours ago
    • Texas showdown

      The U.S. government has a blunt message for landowners along the Mexico border: Let us on your land or we'll sue.

      This week, the Justice Department began legal action against landowners and municipalities who have refused to give government surveyors access to their land.
      The U.S. government has a blunt message for landowners along the Mexico border: Let us on your land or we'll sue. ... more

      Scott_Bromley

      added this

      9 responses

      11 days ago
    • Huckabee Sees Pakistan as Reason for Border Fence

      from the NYT: "Mike Huckabee used the volatile situation in Pakistan Friday to make an argument for building a fence on the American border with Mexico and found himself trying to explain a series of remarks about Pakistanis and their nation.

      On Thursday night he told reporters in Orlando, Fla.: 'We ought to have an immediate, very clear monitoring of our borders and particularly to make sure if there's any unusual activity of Pakistanis coming into the country.'"
      from the NYT: "Mike Huckabee used the volatile situation in Pakistan Friday to make an argument for building a fence on the Ameri... more

      klenga

      added this

      17 responses

      9 days ago
showing 1 - 9 of 9